Editorial: The Review Process

&
Ethics 130 (1):1-4 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/704340

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The framing of argumentation in the making of a political editorial.Marcel Burger & Laura Delaloye - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (1):29-47.
Editorial: Quality and the Review Process.Henry S. Richardson - 2015 - Ethics 126 (1):1-6.
Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process.Jo Ann Carland, James W. Carland & Carroll D. Aby - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104.
Some Opinions on the Review Process of Research Papers Destined for Publication.Ehsan Roohi & Omid Mahian - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):809-812.
Review of the Ethics and Etiquettes of Time Management of Manuscript Peer Review. [REVIEW]Malhar N. Kumar - 2014 - Journal of Academic Ethics 12 (4):333-346.
Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals.J. Luty, S. M. R. Arokiadass, J. M. Easow & J. R. Anapreddy - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):200-202.
Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.Charles T. Mehlman, Radha Holla Bhar, Judit Dobránszki & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):279-298.
Editors Should Declare Conflicts of Interest.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Judit Dobránszki, Radha Holla Bhar & Charles T. Mehlman - 2019 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 16 (2):279-298.
The research ethics review process and ethics review narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Executive Editorial Committee and Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2011 - Radical Philosophy Review 14 (2):264-264.
Editorial.Chris Healy & Stephen Muecke - 2004 - Cultural Studies Review 10 (2):7-8.
Editorial Introduction to the First Issue of Economic Thought.John Latsis, Alejandro Nadal & Annalisa Rosselli - 2012 - Economic Thought 1 (1).
Gatekeepers of Reward: a Pilot Study on the Ethics of Editing and Competing Evaluations of Value.David M. Shaw & Bart Penders - 2018 - Journal of Academic Ethics 16 (3):211-223.
A Proposal to Detect the Double Submission of a Manuscript Sent for Review.Manjur Kolhar, Abdalla Alameen & Safar Bin Bkhit AlMudara - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1315-1329.
Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors.David B. Resnik & Susan A. Elmore - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):169-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-12

Downloads
168 (#111,743)

6 months
8 (#342,364)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Julia Driver
University of Texas at Austin
Connie Rosati
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references