The Kanizsa square does not engender a configural superiority effect

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (3):183-184 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents psychophysical evidence that the Kanizsa Square does not produce an 'object superiority effect' previously reported in similar Gestalt configurations. Implications of the findings for Gestalt theory are addressed.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3758/bf03337319

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Studies in configural conditioning. II. The effect of subjects' attitudes and of task-sets upon configural conditioning. [REVIEW]G. H. S. Razran - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (1):95.
Configural effect in multiple-cue probability learning.Stephen E. Edgell & N. John Castellan - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):310.
Configural Effects in Human Memory: The Superiority of Memory over External Information Sources as a Basis for Inference Verification.Barbara Hayes-Roth & Carol Walker - 1979 - Cognitive Science 3 (2):119-140.
Studies in configural conditioning. III. The factors of similarity, proximity, and continuity in configural conditioning. [REVIEW]G. H. S. Razran - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (2):202.
The effect of gender spaces on females'feeling of security (case study: Madar square & rah-ahan square).Arshiha Modiri Atoosa & Sadat Maryam - 2012 - Social Research (Islamic Azad University Roudehen Branch) 4 (13):119-142.
Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Major: The Love of Money Among University Students in People’s Republic of China. [REVIEW]Linzhi Du & Thomas Li-Ping Tang - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (3):281-293.
From Kanizsa back to benussi: Varieties of intentional reference. [REVIEW]Liliana Albertazzi - 2003 - Axiomathes 13 (3-4):239-259.
The apparent superiority of prediction to accommodation as a side effect: A reply to Maher.Marc Lange - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):575-588.
Individual Differences in (Non‐Visual) Processing Style Predict the Face Inversion Effect.Natalie A. Wyer, Douglas Martin, Tracey Pickup & C. Neil Macrae - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (2):373-384.
Effect of stimulus-response delay on ear superiority for dichotically presented digits.Israel Nachshon & Amiram Carmon - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):288.
Individual Differences in (Non-Visual) Processing Style Predict the Face Inversion Effect.Natalie A. Wyer, Douglas Martin, Tracey Pickup & C. Neil Macrae - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (2):373-384.
Word superiority effect without a brief exposure.W. Prinzmetal - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (6):506-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-22

Downloads
29 (#538,668)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Visuel wahrgenommene Figuren.Edgar Rubin - 1923 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 96:145-147.

Add more references