Shifting Paradigms: From Technocrat to Planetary Person

Lightstar Press (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines and compares two paradigms of technology, nature, and social life, and their associated environmental impacts. I explore moving from technocratic paradigms to the emerging ecological paradigms of planetary person ecosophies. The dominant technocratic philosophy's guiding policy and technological power is mechanistic. It conceptualizes nature as a resource to be controlled for human ends. Its global practices are drastically altering the integrity of the planet's ecosystems. In contrast, the organic, planetary person approaches respect the intrinsic values of all beings. Deep ecology movement principles give priority to community and ecosystem integrity. These deep ecology movement principles guide the design and applications of technology by principles following from ecological understanding. I describe this shift in philosophical paradigms and how it affects our perceptions, values, and actions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep ecology and the foundations of restoration.Michael Vincent McGinnis - 1996 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):203 – 217.
A defence of the deep ecology movement.Arne Naess - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):265-270.
Noosphere, gaia, and the science of the biosphere.Rafal Serafin - 1988 - Environmental Ethics 10 (2):121-137.
Technocratic versus person-planetary.Alan R. Drengson - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (1):93-94.
Deep Anthropology: Ecology and Human Order.Alan E. Wittbecker - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):261-270.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#392,052)

6 months
1 (#454,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?