Ethical Perspectives 14 (4):371-403 (2007)

Authors
Martin Drenthen
Radboud University Nijmegen
Abstract
In moral debates about human’s relationship with nature, one often hears references to nature’s wildness. Apparently, postmodern city dwellers seem to be deeply fascinated by wild nature; for them, wildness somehow seems to have strong moral significance. How should we interpret this fascination? Moral meanings of nature come into play as soon as we start articulating our relationship with the world.In this process, we transform the neutrality of space into a meaningful place, that is, through interpretation we make mere environment into a meaningful and inhabitable world that we can live in. However, there is something peculiar with experiences of wild nature that seems to go beyond this hermeneutical framework. The word ‘wilderness’ refers to the sphere that lies beyond culture, a part of the world that is not subject to human intervention and that is not our home.Does this mean that wildness cannot be part of a meaningful world? In this paper, I argue that Nietzsche’s account of nature can help elucidate today’s fascination with wilderness as a place of value beyond the sphere of human intervention. For Nietzsche, wild nature is a realm where moral valuations are out of order. In his work, however, we can discern a paradoxical moral concern with this wildness. Wildness is a critical moral concept that reminds us that our moral world of human meanings and goals ultimately rests on a much grander, all-encompassing natural world. Nietzsche’s concept of wildness acknowledges the value of that which cannot be morally appropriated. Wild nature confronts us with the limits of human valuing. Wildness as a concept thus introduces the ‘beyond’ of culture into the cultural arena of values
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2143/EP.14.4.2028824
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness.David Graham Henderson - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
Wilderness, Cultivation and Appropriation.John O'Neill - 2002 - Philosophy and Geography 5 (1):35 – 50.
Ecofeminism and Wilderness.Greta Gaard - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (1):5-24.
On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.
Ethics in the Woods.Karen Syse - 2001 - Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):226 – 234.
Wilderness and the Bantu Mind.G. W. Burnett & Kamuyu Wa Kang’Ethe - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):145-160.
What “Wilderness” in Frontier Ecosystems?J. Baird Callicott - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (3):235-249.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
27 ( #423,524 of 2,508,076 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,076 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes