Brain Imaging and Courtroom Deception

Hastings Center Report 40 (6):7-8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deception is an all-too-common human activity, one that succeeds because we cannot always detect it in others. It complicates all sorts of human decision-making, including attributing guilt for criminal offenses. The law relies on human fact-finders to determine whether criminal defendants claiming innocence, as well as witnesses testifying about a case, are telling the truth. But the fallibility of human lie detection has fueled the search for a more accurate replacement. Scientists have developed new approaches to lie detection that use a brain scanning technique called functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to evaluate whether someone is lying. In experimental settings, researchers have found ..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Regulating brain imaging : questions of privacy, informed consent, and human dignity.Roger Brownsword - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 223.
Self-deception vs. self-caused deception: A comment on professor Mele.Robert Audi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):104-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-12

Downloads
29 (#536,973)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Brain Branding: When Neuroscience and Commerce Collide.Bree Chancellor & Anjan Chatterjee - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):18-27.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references