The interaction of association value and stimulus configuration in size estimation

&
Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (5):332 (1957)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0045693

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Stimulus configuration, long-term potentiation, and the hippocampus.Nestor A. Schmajuk - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):629-631.
Reinforcement and extinction as factors in size estimation.William W. Lambert, Richard L. Solomon & Peter D. Watson - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (5):637.
Effect of size on visual slant.Robert B. Freeman Jr - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1):96.
Proportion estimation as a function of proportion and sample size.Wesley M. DuCharme & Cameron R. Peterson - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (3):536.
S-R stimulus selection and strength of R-S association.John P. Houston - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (6):563.
Supplementary report: Effects of stimulus association value and exposure duration on R-S learning.Ned Cassem & Donald H. Kausler - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):94.
Stimulus generality in word association sets.Ronald Neman & Theodore R. Dixon - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):506.
Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax.James W. Dees - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):466.
Some effects of context on the slope in magnitude estimation.F. Nowell Jones & Morris J. Woskow - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):177.
The amygdala – responsible for memories of reward as well as punishment?Amanda Parker - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):213-214.
Stimulus probability and stimulus set size in memory scanning.Irving Biederman & E. Webb Stacy - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1100.
Stimulus and response frequency and sequential effects in memory scanning reaction times.John Theios & Dennis G. Walter - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1092.
Effect of spacing and range of stimuli on magnitude estimation judgements.Panna Lal Pradham & Paul J. Hoffman - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (6):533.
Differential effects of stimulus frequency and graphic configuration in free- and forced-choice experiments.Warren E. Foote & Leston L. Havens - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (3):340.
Size of stimulus in relation to the eye's sensitivity to light and to the amount and rate of dark adaptation.C. E. Ferree, G. Rand & M. R. Stoll - 1934 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 17 (5):646.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
13 (#1,013,785)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references