Minimal weak truth table degrees and computably enumerable Turing degrees

Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. Edited by Keng Meng Ng & Reed Solomon (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informal construction -- Formal construction -- Limiting results.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Interval of Computably Enumerable Isolating Degrees.Matthew C. Salts - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (1):59-72.
The computable Lipschitz degrees of computably enumerable sets are not dense.Adam R. Day - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (12):1588-1602.
Computably Enumerable Reals and Uniformly Presentable Ideals.S. A. Terwijn & R. Downey - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (S1):29-40.
A Hierarchy of Computably Enumerable Degrees.Rod Downey & Noam Greenberg - 2018 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 24 (1):53-89.
Difference sets and computability theory.Rod Downey, Zoltán Füredi, Carl G. Jockusch & Lee A. Rubel - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 93 (1-3):63-72.
The weak truth table degrees of recursively enumerable sets.R. E. Ladner - 1975 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 8 (4):429.
Mass problems and almost everywhere domination.Stephen G. Simpson - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (4):483-492.
Interpreting N in the computably enumerable weak truth table degrees.André Nies - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 107 (1-3):35-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-03

Downloads
7 (#1,360,984)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references