Liar paradox

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Liar Paradox is an argument that arrives at a contradiction by reasoning about a Liar Sentence. The classical Liar Sentence is the self-referential sentence “This sentence is false.”

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The liar, the strengthened liar, and bivalence.Adam Rieger - 2001 - Erkenntnis 54 (2):195-203.
On the storeyed revenge of strengthened liars, and the contrary finality of no-proposition resolutions.Jordan Howard Sobel - manuscript
The liar paradox in new clothes.Jeff Snapper - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):319-322.
The early Arabic liar: the liar paradox in the Islamic world from the mid-ninth to the mid-thirteenth centuries CE.Ahmed Alwishah & David Sanson - 2009 - Vivarium 47 (1):97-127.
A proof of the (strengthened) liar formula in a semantical extension of peano arithmetic.Jeffrey Ketland - 2000 - Analysis 60 (1):1–4.
Revenge of the liar: new essays on the paradox.J. C. Beall (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Truthmaker Gaps and the No-No Paradox.Patrick Greenough - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):547 - 563.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#299,806)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Gene networks and liar paradoxes.Mark Isalan - 2009 - Bioessays 31 (10):1110-1115.
The Liar Paradox in Plato.Richard McDonough - 2015 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy (1):9-28.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references