Are doctoral progress reviews just a bureaucratic process? The influence of UK universities’ progress review procedures on doctoral completions

Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education:1-8 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Process of Doctoral Research Constraints and Opportunities.David Allen & National Conference on Doctoral Research in Management and Industrial Relations - 1982 - Health Services Management Unit, Dept. Of Social Administration, University of Manchester.
Ethics and accounting doctoral education.Stephen E. Loeb - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):817 - 828.
The Doctorally Prepared Nurse Report of Two Conferences on the Demand for and Education of Nurses with Doctoral Degrees.Thomas P. Phillips, United States, Conference on Issues in Doctoral Education for Nurses & Conference on Doctoral Manpower in Nursing - 1976 - U.S. Dept. Of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Health Resources Administration, Bureau of Health Manpower, Division of Nursing for Sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-27

Downloads
4 (#1,595,600)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references