Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I take it as obvious that attempts to justify the criminal law must be sensitive to matters of criminalization—to what conduct is proscribed or permitted. I discuss three additional matters that should be addressed in order to justify the criminal law. First, we must have a rough idea of what degree of deviation is tolerable between the set of criminal laws we ought to have and the set we really have. Second, we need information about how the criminal law at any given time and place is administered, since the law in action is bound to differ radically from the law on the books. Finally, we must have some basis for speculating what life would be like in the absence of a system of criminal justice—if the state ceased to impose punishments



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law.R. A. Duff & Stuart Green (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
What kind of responsibility must criminal law presuppose?R. A. Duff - 2011 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Free Will and Modern Science. New York: OUP/British Academy.
Towards a theory of criminal law?R. A. Duff - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Towards a Modest Legal Moralism.R. A. Duff - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):217-235.
Theorizing Criminal Law Reform.Roger A. Shiner - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (2):167-186.
Review of Ignorance Of Law: A Philosophical Inquiry, by Douglas Husak. [REVIEW]Stephen Bero - 2017 - Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books 2017 (March).
Criminal law.Leo Katz - 1996 - In Dennis M. Patterson (ed.), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Blackwell. pp. 90–102.
Criminal Law and Cultural Diversity.Will Kymlicka, Claes Lernestedt & Matt Matravers (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
89 (#58,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Douglas Husak
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
Coming Clean About the Criminal Law.James Edwards - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):315-332.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Practical reason and norms.Joseph Raz - 1975 - London: Hutchinson.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.

View all 30 references / Add more references