Authors
Trent Dougherty
University of Rochester (PhD)
Brandon Rickabaugh
Palm Beach Atlantic University
Abstract
One not infrequently hears rumors that the robust practice of natural theology reeks of epistemic pride. Paul Moser’s is a paradigm of such contempt. In this paper we defend the robust practice of natural theology from the charge of epistemic pride. In taking an essentially Thomistic approach, we argue that the evidence of natural theology should be understood as a species of God’s general self-revelation. Thus, an honest assessment of that evidence need not be prideful, but can be an act of epistemic humility, receiving what God has offered, answering God’s call. Lastly, we provide criticisms of Moser’s alternative approach, advancing a variety of philosophical and theological problems against his conception of personifying evidence.
Keywords Natural Theology  Religious Epistemology  Paul Moser  Epistemic Humility  Evidentialism  Personifying Evidence  Filial Knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v9i2.1924
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Open-Minded People Should Endorse Dogmatism.Chris Tucker - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):529-545.
The Emergent Self.William Hasker - 2001 - Cornell University Press.
Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology.Earl Conee & Richard Feldman - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):147-149.
The Problem of Evil.Peter van Inwagen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):696-698.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Traditional Natural Theology Cognitively Presumptuous.Paul K. Moser & Clinton Neptune - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):213-222.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Access Denied: A Reply to Rickabaugh and McAllister.Christopher M. P. Tomaszewski & John W. Rosenbaum - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 83 (2):201-207.
The Origin [and Demise] of [a] Species [of Natural Theology].David Schrader - 2004 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 7.
Nineteenth-Century Natural Theology.Matthew D. Eddy - 2013 - In J. H. Brooke, F. Watts & R. R. Manning (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford Up. pp. 100.
Revisiting the ‘Reformed Objection’ to Natural Theology.Michael Sudduth - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (2):37-62.
Lockean Superaddition and Lockean Humility.Patrick J. Connolly - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51:53-61.
Charles Darwin's Use of Theology in the Origin of Species.Stephen Dilley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Science 45 (1):29-56.
Courage, Evidence, And Epistemic Virtue.Osvil Acosta-Morales - 2006 - Florida Philosophical Review 6 (1):8-16.
Natural Theology and Literature.Guy Bennett-Hunter - 2013 - In Russell Re Manning John Hedley Brooke & Fraser Watts (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford University Press.
Natural Theology: A Recent History.Olli-Pekka Vainio - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (2):1-18.
The Cumulative Approach to Natural Theology.John Michael Beaudoin - 1997 - Dissertation, The University of Iowa

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-19

Total views
447 ( #20,745 of 2,498,570 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #19,868 of 2,498,570 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes