Moral Bookkeeping

Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is widespread agreement among philosophers about the Mens Rea Asymmetry (MRA), according to which praise requires intent, whereas blame does not. However, there is evidence showing that MRA is descriptively inadequate. We hypothesize that the violations of MRA found in the experimental literature are due to what we call “moral compositionality,” by which we mean that people evaluate the component parts of a moral problem separately and then reach an overall verdict by aggregating the verdicts on the component parts. We have subjected this hypothesis to the test and here report the results of our experiment. We explore several explanations of the experimental findings and conclude that they present a puzzle to moral theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How do people choose between local and global bookkeeping?George Ainslie - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):574-575.
Double bookkeeping in delusions: Explaining the gap between saying and doing.Lisa Bortolotti - 2010 - In A. Buckareff, J. Aguilar & K. Frankish (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Action. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 237--256.
Intentional action and the praise-blame asymmetry.Frank Hindriks - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (233):630-641.
Moral Bookkeeping, Consequentialism, and Carbon Offsets.Julia Driver - 2014 - In Avram Hiller, Ramona Ilea & Leonard Kahn (eds.), Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics. Routledge. pp. 164-173.
Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2006 - The European Legacy 11 (7):849-851.
In Praise of Blame.Barbara Houston - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (4):128 - 147.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-19

Downloads
13 (#876,813)

6 months
13 (#116,622)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Frank Hindriks
University of Groningen
Igor Douven
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Person as scientist, person as moralist.Joshua Knobe - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):315.
Control, responsibility, and moral assessment.Angela M. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):367 - 392.
Theory of Probability.Harold Jeffreys - 1940 - Philosophy of Science 7 (2):263-264.

View all 14 references / Add more references