Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control

Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12) (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Would compulsory treatment or vaccination for Covid-19 be justified? In England, there would be significant legal barriers to it. However, we offer a conditional ethical argument in favour of allowing compulsory treatment and vaccination, drawing on an ethical comparison with external constraints—such as quarantine, isolation and ‘lockdown’—that have already been authorised to control the pandemic. We argue that, if the permissive English approach to external constraints for Covid-19 has been justified, then there is a case for a similarly permissive approach to compulsory medical interventions.

Similar books and articles

Should childhood immunisation be compulsory?P. Bradley - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):330-334.
Is compulsory voting justified?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Public Reason 1 (1):57-74.
Relational ethical approaches to the COVID-19 pandemic.David Ian Jeffrey - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (8):495-498.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-19

Downloads
524 (#33,009)

6 months
80 (#50,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford
Lisa Forsberg
University of Oxford
Jonathan Pugh
University of Oxford