Abstract
On one meaning of the term “historicism” to be a historicist is to be committed to the claim that the human sciences have a methodology of their own that is distinct in kind and not only in degree from that of the natural sciences. In this sense of the term Collingwood certainly was a historicist, for he defended the view that history is an autonomous discipline with a distinctive method and subject matter against the claim for methodological unity in the sciences. On another interpretation historicism is a relativist way of thinking which denies the possibility of universal and fundamental interpretations of historical or cultural phenomena. In the following I argue that at least in this second sense of “historicism” Collingwood was everything but a historicist. Quine, on the contrary, was nothing but a historicist. The goal of the comparison, however, is not to establish just who, on this definition, was or was not a historicist, but to draw a few conclusions about what a commitment to or rejection of historicism in this sense, tells us about the nature of understanding
Keywords Re-enactment   radical translation   Collingwood   Quine   historicism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18722636-12341256
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Epistemology Naturalized.W. V. Quine - 1969 - In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. Quine - 1951 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 202-220.
Indeterminacy of Translation.Alan Weir - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Vicissitude of Completeness: Gadamer's Criticism of Collingwood.Dimitrios Vardoulakis - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (1):3 – 19.
Distinguishing WV Quine and Donald Davidson.James Pearson - 2011 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22.
Collingwood and Weber Vs. Mink: History After the Cognitive Turn.Stephen Turner - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):230-260.
Re-Enacting in the Second Person.Karim Dharamsi - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):163-178.
Rethinking R.Gary K. Browning - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The 'Object' of Historical Knowledge.P. Gardiner - 1952 - Philosophy 27 (102):211-220.
A Just Medium: Empathy and Detachment in Historical Understanding.Constantine Sandis - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (2):179-200.
Historicism and Philosophy: Reflections on R. G. Collingwood.N. Rotenstreich - 1957 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11 (4):401-419.
On the Concept of “Radical Understanding”.Gaetano Chiurazzi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 2:7-12.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-09

Total views
22 ( #500,760 of 2,463,138 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,108 of 2,463,138 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes