The Sublime and Modern Subjectivity: The Discourse of Elevation From Neo-Classicism to French Romanticism

Dissertation, Stanford University (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation reinterprets the notion of the "sublime" in relation to modern culture. Seen as a discourse of elevation and emblem of heroic values, what characterizes the sublime in the modern era is its ability to reconcile notions of autonomy and transcendence, in the context of secularization. I show how this attempt at reconciliation figures in important ways in thinking the modern individual from an aesthetic as well as an anthropological perspective. The French Revolution is a pivot point in this study, for it signals the breakdown of social hierarchies and a corresponding loss of transcendence on the political level. The negative social effects of equality came as a shock to the Romantic liberals who believed in a heroic individualism based on the sublime. As the individual diminished in power and authority with the growth of democracy, heroic values gradually came to be considered as anachronistic. I analyze the theoretical and fictional works of the French Romantics to show how their belief in a heroic individualism leads to a clash between their political liberalism and their aesthetic ideals. The ultimate failure of the Romantic attempt to reconcile the sublime with a post-Revolutionary society tending toward democracy is seen by later thinkers as an indicator of cultural decline. ;The dissertation proceeds historically, and is divided into two parts: Part I studies how the notion of the sublime figures in the subjective turn of modern thought; Part II examines the discursive function of the sublime in the social critique of prominent French Romantics. Part I begins with an extended analysis of Longinus' first-century treatise Peri Hypsous , followed by a consideration of Longinus' reception in Nicholas Boileau, John Dennis, and Giambattista Vico. Subsequent chapters on Abbe Du Bos, Edmund Burke and Immanuel Kant treat the notion of the sublime with respect to the development of European aesthetic thought. The second part focuses on three French writers of the nineteenth century, Madame de Stael, Stendhal, and Victor Hugo. The conclusion connects the late modern nostalgia for the sublime with the pessimistic philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The sublime: from antiquity to the present.Timothy M. Costelloe (ed.) - 2012 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Sublime and the Subliminal.Harvie Ferguson - 2004 - Theory, Culture and Society 21 (3):1-33.
The sublime and the other.Richard White - 1997 - Heythrop Journal 38 (2):125–143.
The Byronic Sublime.Milton Jeffrey Waldrop - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Mississippi
The Digital Sublime: Lessons from Kelli Connell's Double Life.Yi-Hui Huang - 2012 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 46 (4):70-79.
The Force of the Sublime: Lyotard, Beckett, Duras.Richard Andrew Slade - 2003 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Sublime Politics: On the Uses of an Aesthetics of Terror.Steven Cresap - 1990 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 19 (2):111-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
1 (#1,841,214)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references