Science and supernaturalism

Think 15 (42):35-52 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the first section of this paper, I discuss a quantum mechanical account, which is endorsed by the MIT physicist, Alan Guth, of the origin of what Guth believes to have been an absolutely first universe. I argue that, though his explanation is unsound, there is no reason to think that it needs to be replaced by a supernaturalist one. In the second section, I argue that though Professor Steven Weinberg's tentative explanation of the apparent fine-tuning of the cosmological constant is unacceptable, we need not accept a supernaturalist account of the coming about of intelligent life

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Miracles and Science: Mora than a Miraculous Relationship.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2012 - Toronto Journal of Theology 28 (1):159-163.
Probability, Explanation, and Reasoning.Roger White - 2000 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Why Cosmic Fine-Tuning Needs to Be Explained.Neil Alan Manson - 1998 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Ethical supernaturalism.Clement Dore - 1976 - Sophia 15 (3):19-25.
Refined and Crass Supernaturalism: T. L. S. Sprigge.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1992 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 32:105-125.
Astrophysical fine tuning, naturalism, and the contemporary design argument.Mark A. Walker & M. Milan - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-09

Downloads
64 (#247,828)

6 months
15 (#157,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references