The Gettier Problem and the Parable of the Ten Coins

Philosophy 70 (271):5 - 25 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Where have you been?’ I expect philosophers to ask me this when I tell them that this paper is on the Gettier Problem. I found it difficult to participate in the discussion of the problem until now because instead of wanting to consider what could be done to revive the project of identifying necessary and conditions for knowledge after the apparent damage done to it by Gettier counter-examples, I wanted to question the legitimacy of the project itself

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
68 (#235,043)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Don Levi
University of Oregon

Citations of this work

Gettier Cases and Normal Reasoners.Carlos García - 2007 - Ideas Y Valores 56 (135):77–88.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Edmund Gettier - 1963 - Analysis 23 (6):121-123.
The Analysis of Knowing.Robert K. Shope - 1984 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 89 (1):131-132.
Some Implications of 'Someone'.C. G. New - 1965 - Analysis 26 (2):62 - 64.

View all 7 references / Add more references