Natural Punishment

North Carolina Law Review 100 (2):557-600 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A man, carrying a gun in his waistband, robs a food vendor. In making his escape, the gun discharges, critically injuring the robber. About such instances, it is common to think, “he got what he deserved.” This Article seeks to explore cases like that—cases of “natural punishment.” Natural punishment occurs when a wrongdoer faces serious harm that results from her wrongdoing and not from anyone seeking retribution against her. The Article proposes that U.S. courts follow their peers and recognize natural punishment as genuine punishment for legal, specifically constitutional, purposes. Were U.S. courts to do so, they would need to reduce the amount of punishment they would otherwise bestow on wrongdoers upon conviction if a natural punishment has occurred or foreseeably will occur. A handful of foreign jurisdictions already accept something like this Article’s proposal, but natural punishment has no formal legal recognition in the United States. The goal of this Article is twofold: first, it offers a rigorous and defensible definition of natural punishment by distinguishing it from nearby notions and dispelling any association with supernatural ideas; second, it demonstrates that recognizing natural punishment as genuine punishment will not much disturb existing American legal institutions and understandings. As an added bonus, the concept of natural punishment can be employed to solve a longstanding problem in criminal law theory, the Mystery of Credit for Time Served. The Mystery surrounds the common practice of giving prisoners credit toward their prison sentences for their time served in jail awaiting trial. The Mystery poses a dilemma about whether the detention time was punishment: If it was punishment, then the detainee was punished before trial in violation of Due Process; however, if the time was not punishment, there is no reason to discount the prison sentence. Seeing the time in detention as an instance of natural punishment resolves the Mystery.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2010 - Oxford Bibliographies Online.
Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2012 - Routledge.
Making sense of retributivism.J. Angelo Corlett - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (1):77-110.
A Kantian critique of Kant's theory of punishment.Merle J.-C. - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (3):311-338.
Retributivism: Essays on Theory and Policy.Mark D. White (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Contractualism and Punishment.Hon-Lam Li - 2015 - Criminal Justice Ethics 34 (2):177-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-09

Downloads
54 (#220,469)

6 months
22 (#52,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raff Donelson
Illinois Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

“Already punished enough”.Douglas N. Husak - 1990 - Philosophical Topics 18 (1):79-99.
Already Punished Enough.Douglas N. Husak - 1990 - Philosophical Topics 18 (1):79-99.

Add more references