Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response: New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006, 172 pp, Hb, US$ 70.00 [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):171-172 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11153-007-9130-0

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review: Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]G. Oppy - 2008 - Mind 117 (467):690-693.
Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daniel A. Dombrowski: Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]Elizabeth Burns - 2009 - Heythrop Journal 50 (4):719-721.
Daniel A. Dombrowski, rethinking the ontological argument: A neoclassical theistic response. [REVIEW]Donald Wayne Viney - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (3):171-172.
Rethinking the Ontological Argument. [REVIEW]Andrew Nam - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):461-464.
Rethinking the Ontological Argument. [REVIEW]James Ross - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):147-150.
Ontološki argument neoklasičnog teizma-Daniel A. Dombrovski: Rethinking the ontological argument: A neoclassical theistic response, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.Drago Đurić - 2010 - Theoria: Beograd 53 (4):125-133.
Daniel Dombrowski. A Platonic Philosophy of Religion: A Process Perspective. State University of New York Press, 2005. / Daniel Dombrowski. Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. Cambridge University Press, 2006. [REVIEW]Nagasawa Yujin - 2009 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):177--181.
Review of Daniel A. Dombrowski, Rethinking the Ontological Argument: A Neoclassical Theistic Response. [REVIEW]Sandra Visser - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (12).
Is the ontological proof for God’s existence an ontological proof for God’s existence?Marcin Tkaczyk - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 16 (4):289-309.
Hartshorne Theistic and Anti-Theistic Arguments.Donald Wayne Viney & George W. Shields - 2015
Response to Maydole.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski (ed.), Ontological Proofs Today. Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-68.
The Ontological Argument: Past, Present, and Future?Shaun Smith - 2013 - Sententias.
Makin's Ontological Argument (Again).Graham Oppy - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (264):234 - 239.
The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2007 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Oxford UK: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-22

Downloads
20 (#720,454)

6 months
11 (#191,387)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Viney
Pittsburg State University

Citations of this work

Homer, Competition, and Sport.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):33-51.
Oppy, infinity, and the neoclassical concept of God.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):25 - 37.
Rival concepts of God and rival versions of mysticism.Daniel A. Dombrowski - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1-3):153-165.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references