What is ‘religious experience’ in Schleiermacher’s Dogmatics, and why does it matter?

Journal of Analytic Theology 4:44-65 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Schleiermacher is often credited with elevating the notion of ‘religious experience’ to prominence in theology and the study of religion. But his position on religious experience is poorly understood, largely because he is typically read through the lens of his later appropriators. In this essay I make a set of claims about what ‘religious experience’ amounts to in Schleiermacher’s mature dogmatics, _The Christian Faith_. What is noteworthy about Schleiermacher’s position is its calculated coherence with religious naturalism, understood as the position that religious phenomena have natural causes. I then argue that Schleiermacher’s understanding of religious experience is actually promising for contemporary discussions– partly because it allows for productive conversation with religious naturalists, and partly in virtue of the utility of Schleiermacher’s claim regarding the kind of religious experience at the heart of Christian religious identity.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,179

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religious Experience.George Karuvelil - 2011 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 16 (1):139-155.
Schleiermacher and Otto on religion.Andrew Dole - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):389-413.
Metaphysical Realism and Epistemological Modesty in Schleiermacher’s Method.Jacqueline Mariña - 2012 - In Chris L. Firestone & Nathan A. Jacobs (eds.), The Persistence of the Sacred in Modern Thought. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press.
Lewis on Experience, Reason, and Religious Belief.Eugene Thomas Long - 1981 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (1):87 - 109.


Added to PP

34 (#371,030)

6 months
2 (#332,645)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?