- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of “Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law” [Book Review]
Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):93-102 (2012)
Abstract
This is a review of the challenging book in which Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan propose sweeping revisions to the structure of substantive criminal lawMy notes
Similar books and articles
Crime and culpability: A theory of criminal law * by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Kessler ferzan, with Stephen Morse.M. L. Corrado - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):403-405.
Criminal culpability: The possibility of a general theory. [REVIEW]Jeremy Horder - 1993 - Law and Philosophy 12 (2):193 - 215.
Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (by Larry Alexander et al.). [REVIEW]Holly Lawford-Smith - 2010 - Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 35:152-158.
The philosophy of criminal law: selected essays.Douglas N. Husak - 2010 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Review of May & Hoskins, International Criminal Law and Philosophy. [REVIEW]Matthew Lister - 2010 - Concurring Opinions Blog:1.
Digging Up, Dismantling, and Redesigning the Criminal Law.Kimberley Brownlee - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):169-178.
Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287.
Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law.Michael S. Moore - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Legislative duty and the independence of law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
Towards a theory of criminal law?R. A. Duff - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Harm and culpability.A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-11-17
Downloads
87 (#190,661)
6 months
11 (#226,803)
2011-11-17
Downloads
87 (#190,661)
6 months
11 (#226,803)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Relevance of Intention to Criminal Wrongdoing.Dana Kay Nelkin & Samuel C. Rickless - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (4):745-762.
Iconoclasts? Who, Us? A Reply to Dolinko.Larry Alexander & Kimberly Kessler Ferzan - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):281-287.
References found in this work
Placing blame: a theory of the criminal law.Michael S. Moore - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law.Larry Alexander, Kimberly Kessler Ferzan & Stephen J. Morse - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Kimberly Kessler Ferzan & Stephen J. Morse.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo