Licensed to Practice: The Supreme Court Defines the American Medical Profession by James C. Mohr

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25 (4):6-10 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When picking up a book titled Licensed to Practice: The Supreme Court Defines the American Medical Profession, one cannot be faulted for expecting a rather dry legal discourse on the Supreme Court case that cemented medical licensure as the norm of American life. James Mohr dispels these expectations from the very first page of the volume. Instead of recitation of legal doctrine, Mohr begins with a murder mystery. While we know from the very first pages the answer to “whodunit,” the rest of the book masterfully explains why they did it. As it turns out, what led to the murder was an intense fight over the proper way to practice medicine. Mohr’s work is..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics, advertising and the definition of a profession.A. R. Dyer - 1985 - Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (2):72-78.
American Legal Philosophy.Richard Tur - 1985 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 19:255-272.
Higher Courts.Adam Potthast - 2007 - Teaching Ethics 8 (1):121-124.
The Other Side of Professionalism: Doctor-to-Doctor.Julia E. Connelly - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (2):178-183.
Assisting suicide in michigan.Joseph Ellin - 1996 - Bioethics 10 (1):56–70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-14

Downloads
15 (#926,042)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references