What Would Taurek Do?

Abstract

A very short, exegetical paper about Taurek's "Should the Numbers Count?," arguing against the view that Taurek requires giving chances.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Numbers scepticism, equal chances and pluralism: Taurek revisited.Gerald Lang & Rob Lawlor - 2016 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 15 (3):298-315.
Disability discrimination in emergencies: The return of Taurek?Ben Davies - 2023 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 22 (3):1048-1062.
Save the Five: Meeting Taurek's Challenge.Zach Barnett - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
What Is Wrong With Kamm and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek.Tyler Doggett - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3):1-16.
Taurek, numbers and probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.
Why the numbers should sometimes count.John T. Sanders - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (1):3-14.
Utilitarian Idealism and Personal Relations.Earl R. Winkler - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):265 - 286.
The Many, the Few, and the Nature of Value.Daniel Muñoz - 2022 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):70-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-23

Downloads
734 (#26,477)

6 months
131 (#45,467)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tyler Doggett
University of Vermont

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
Taurek, numbers and probabilities.Rob Lawlor - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):149 - 166.

View all 10 references / Add more references