Abstract

Global anti-realism, the view that all truths are dependent on the dispositions and practices of humans , is defined, and a detailed version of the view is proposed. Then two arguments in defense of global anti-realism are canvassed. According to the first argument, since no explanation is to be expected of the human faculty for knowledge, global anti-realism should be endorsed. According to the second argument that is discussed, global anti-realism makes for an ethically more palatable philosophy