The Ramsey theory of the universal homogeneous triangle-free graph
Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (2):2050012 (2020)
Abstract
The universal homogeneous triangle-free graph, constructed by Henson [A family of countable homogeneous graphs, Pacific J. Math.38(1) (1971) 69–83] and denoted H3, is the triangle-free analogue of the Rado graph. While the Ramsey theory of the Rado graph has been completely established, beginning with Erdős–Hajnal–Posá [Strong embeddings of graphs into coloured graphs, in Infinite and Finite Sets. Vol.I, eds. A. Hajnal, R. Rado and V. Sós, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, Vol. 10 (North-Holland, 1973), pp. 585–595] and culminating in work of Sauer [Coloring subgraphs of the Rado graph, Combinatorica26(2) (2006) 231–253] and Laflamme–Sauer–Vuksanovic [Canonical partitions of universal structures, Combinatorica26(2) (2006) 183–205], the Ramsey theory of H3 had only progressed to bounds for vertex colorings [P. Komjáth and V. Rödl, Coloring of universal graphs, Graphs Combin.2(1) (1986) 55–60] and edge colorings [N. Sauer, Edge partitions of the countable triangle free homogenous graph, Discrete Math.185(1–3) (1998) 137–181]. This was due to a lack of broadscale techniques. We solve this problem in general: For each finite triangle-free graph G, there is a finite number T(G) such that for any coloring of all copies of G in H3 into finitely many colors, there is a subgraph of H3 which is again universal homogeneous triangle-free in which the coloring takes no more than T(G) colors. This is the first such result for a homogeneous structure omitting copies of some nontrivial finite structure. The proof entails developments of new broadscale techniques, including a flexible method for constructing trees which code H3 and the development of their Ramsey theory.DOI
10.1142/s0219061320500129
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ramsey Theory for Countable Binary Homogeneous Structures.Jean A. Larson - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (3):335-352.
Small universal families for graphs omitting cliques without GCH.Katherine Thompson - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (7-8):799-811.
$triangle^1_3$-Sets of Reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72-80.
Ramsey classes of topological and metric spaces.Jaroslav Nešetřil - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 143 (1-3):147-154.
Homogeneity in relatively free groups.Oleg Belegradek - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (7-8):781-787.
The polarized Ramsey’s theorem.Damir D. Dzhafarov & Jeffry L. Hirst - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (2):141-157.
Fraïssé sequences: category-theoretic approach to universal homogeneous structures.Wiesław Kubiś - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (11):1755-1811.
Stable Ramsey's Theorem and Measure.Damir D. Dzhafarov - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):95-112.
Logical aspects of Cayley-graphs: the group case.Dietrich Kuske & Markus Lohrey - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):263-286.
Types in Abstract Elementary Classes.Tapani Hyttinen - 2004 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 45 (2):99-108.
$${\Pi^1_2}$$ -comprehension and the property of Ramsey.Christoph Heinatsch - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (3-4):323-386.
Finitely generated submodels of an uncountably categorical homogeneous structure.Tapani Hyttinen - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (1):77.
Particulars, modes and universals: An examination of E.j. Lowe's four-fold ontology.Fraser MacBride - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):317–333.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-12-06
Downloads
7 (#1,044,287)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
2019-12-06
Downloads
7 (#1,044,287)
6 months
1 (#448,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Big Ramsey degrees in universal inverse limit structures.Natasha Dobrinen & Kaiyun Wang - forthcoming - Archive for Mathematical Logic:1-33.
References found in this work
Models without indiscernibles.Fred G. Abramson & Leo A. Harrington - 1978 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (3):572-600.
A tail Cone version of the halpern–läuchli theorem at a large cardinal.Jing Zhang - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (2):473-496.
Partitions of large Rado graphs.M. Džamonja, J. A. Larson & W. J. Mitchell - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (6):579-606.
The halpern–läuchli theorem at a measurable cardinal.Natasha Dobrinen & Dan Hathaway - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (4):1560-1575.