Schellenberg’s Hiddenness Argument and its Reversal

Philosophia 50 (4):1687-1705 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article discusses a response to Schellenberg’s atheistic ‘hiddenness argument’ that neither objects to its premises nor formulates a new inductive argument in favour of the existence of God. According to the proposed response, it is sufficient for the task of defending theism to reverse Schellenberg’s reasoning and present a theistic meta-argument that takes as its assumption the fact that there are resistant believers in the world. The paper defends the claim that both arguments have similar persuasive power. However, because of their contradictory conclusions both cannot be sound. It is argued that the way to decide the dilemma is to compare the demographics of theism and atheism and to compare accommodation strategies of both arguments. The first comparison favours theism, but it does not exclude the possibility that quantitative proportions between theists and atheists can change in the future. The second comparison refers to accommodation strategies of proponents of A-argument who have to give an account of how it is possible that in an atheistic world there exist resistant believers and of proponents of T-argument who have to give an account of how it is possible that in the world governed by an all-powerful and all-loving God there exist nonresistant nonbelievers. The conclusion of the considerations is the claim that the theistic accommodation strategy compares favourably to the atheistic one.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,418

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-31

Downloads
46 (#384,080)

6 months
12 (#231,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Marek Dobrzeniecki
Catholic Academy In Warsaw
Jacek Wojtysiak
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethnographic atlas.George Peter Murdock - 1967 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Propositional faith: what it is and what it is not.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 1995 - American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):357-372.

View all 40 references / Add more references