Non-Libertarianism and Shareholder Theory: A Reply to Schaefer [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):273 - 279 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Libertarianism and the shareholder model of corporate responsibility have long been thought of as natural bedfellows. In a recent contribution to the Journal of Business Ethics, Brian Schaefer goes so far as to suggest that a proponent of shareholder theory cannot coherendy and consistently embrace any moral position other than philosophical libertarianism. The view that managers have a fiduciary obligation to advance the interests of shareholders exclusively is depicted as fundamentally incompatible with the acknowledgement of natural positive duties – duties to aid others that have not been acquired by some prior commitment or transaction. I argue that Schaefer is mistaken. Positive duties are incompatible with the shareholder model only if we must contribute to their fulfilment in the corporate context; only if we have some reason to think that it is not possible or not permissible to discharge these obligations entirely in our private lives or through our various other roles and capacities. But we have no good reason to accept this. I argue that individuals are presumptively free to decide how and when to discharge their positive duties, and that buying shares does not cause this presumption to lapse. Hence a non-libertarian moral theory can be held without incoherence by a proponent of the shareholder model

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,418

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’.Samuel Mansell - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (3):583-599.
The ownership model of business ethics.David Rodin - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1‐2):163-181.
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Shareholder Theory in Academia.Stephen Kershnar - 2017 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 36 (3):359-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-28

Downloads
62 (#279,925)

6 months
12 (#231,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ned Dobos
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Cambridge: Blackwell.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
Moral Reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Philosophy 69 (267):114-116.

View all 21 references / Add more references