Boethvs of Sidon
Classical Quarterly 8 (02):88- (1914)
Abstract
The study of post-Aristotelian philosophy is constantly confused by the perplexing way in which the names of philosophers recur. Zeno, the founder of Stoicism, is sufficiently well known not be confused with either Zeno the Eleatic or the later Stoic, Zeno of Tarsus, a disciple of Chrysippus; but when we come to less distinguished names the opportunity of error is greater. If two philosophers of the same name are prominent members of different schools, there ought to be no obscurity, but in an age of eclecticism one school will sometimes adopt doctrines from another, and so make classification difficultDOI
10.1017/s0009838800019686
My notes
Similar books and articles
An Excerpt from Boethus of Sidon's Commentary on the Categories?Pamela M. Huby - 1981 - Classical Quarterly 31 (02):398-.
What Does Aristotle Categorize? Semantics and the Early Peripatetic Reading of the Categories.Michael J. Griffin - 2012 - Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55 (1):65-108.
Epicurus on 'Free Volition' and the Atomic Swerve.Jeffrey Purinton - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (4):253-299.
Toward a Feminist Firm: Comments on John Dobson and Judith White.Robbin Derry - 1996 - Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (1):101-109.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-12-09
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2010-12-09
Downloads
28 (#419,126)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads