Comparative Philosophy: What it Is and What it Ought to Be

Diogenes 34 (136):58-69 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ali comparative studies imply simultaneously an identity and a difference, a situation that is replete with intellectual difficulties which give rise to interminable disputes regarding whether we are talking about the same thing or different things. One may cut the gordian knot by deciding either way, but the situation would reappear again as it is bound up with the comparative perspective itself and not with any particular example of it. How long shall we go on “naming”, for the process is unending and ultimately “everything is what it is. and not another thing”. Or, if we do not like “names” as they hardly give us any knowledge and if we opt for “description” which gives us “facts”, then they too are as unending as the “names”, for, as the Jains taught us long ago, they are a function of the dṛṣti that we have or the point of view that we adopt.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
151 (#121,386)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Chinese and Western philosophy in dialogue.Ronnie Littlejohn & Qingjun Li - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (1):10-20.
Why Feminist Comparative Philosophy?Ashby Butnor & Jennifer McWeeny - 2009 - American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Asian and Asian American Philosophers and Philosophies 9 (1):4-5.
Contrary Thinking: Selected Essays of Daya Krishna.Nalini Bhushan, Jay L. Garfield & Daniel Raveh (eds.) - 2011 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references