Market non‐neutrality: Systemic bias in spontaneous orders

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (1):121-144 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract The market is sometimes thought to be a largely neutral means for coordinating cooperation among strangers under complex conditions because it is, as Hayek noted, a ?spontaneous order.? But in fact the market actively shapes the kinds of values it rewards, as do other spontaneous orders. Recognizing these biases allows us to see how such orders impinge on one another and on other communities basic to human life, sometimes negatively. In this way we may come to acknowledge the inevitability of placing limits on spontaneous orders.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spontaneous order: Michael Polanyi and Friedrich Hayek.Struan Jacobs - 2000 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (4):49-67.
Science, the Market and Iterative Knowledge.Leslie Marsh & David Hardwick - 2012 - Studies in Emergent Order 5:26-44.
On legal order: Some criticism of the received view. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Systemic rationality and the effects of financial regulation: Rejoinder to Kindleberger.Steven Horwitz - 1994 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 8 (4):615-621.
Michael Polanyi and Spontaneous Order, 1941-1951.Struan Jacobs - 1997 - Tradition and Discovery 24 (2):14-28.
Democracy as a spontaneous order.Gus diZerega - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (2):206-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?