Why Losing by a Wide Margin is Not in Itself a Disgrace: Response to Hardman, Fox, McLaughlin and Zimmerman

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 25 (1):61-70 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Refocusing on the data: A reply to Hardman.David W. Green - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):95 – 96.
Into the margin!Michèle Pujol - 1995 - In Edith Kuiper & Jolande Sap (eds.), Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics. Routledge. pp. 17--34.
Regarding Nature, Anti-Industrialism and Deep Ecology: A Response to McLaughlin.T. Luke - 1994 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1994 (100):159-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
23 (#664,515)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hubris, Humility, and Humiliation: Vice and Virtue in Sporting Communities.Mike McNamee - 2002 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (1):38-53.
The Inevitability of Disappointment: Reply to Feezell.Nicholas Dixon - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):93-99.
Good Grasshopping and the Avoidance of Game-Spoiling.Deborah P. Vossen - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (2):175-192.
Mercy Killing: Sportsmanship and Blowouts.Pam R. Sailors - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (1):60-68.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On Sportsmanship and “Running Up the Score”.Nicholas Dixon - 1992 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 19 (1):1-13.

Add more references