- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Intrinsic Wrongness of Trash Talking and How It Diminishes the Practice of Sport: Reply to Kershnar
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (2):211-225 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The Moral Rules of Trash Talking: Morality and Ownership.Stephen Kershnar - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (3):303-323.
Trash talking, respect for opponents and good competition.Nicholas Dixon - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):96 – 106.
Trash Talking as Irrelevant to Athletic Excellence: Response to Summers.Nicholas Dixon - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (1):90-96.
The Intrinsic Value of Sport: A Reply to Culbertson.Graham McFee - 2009 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 3 (1):19-29.
For Ownership Theory: A Response to Nicholas Dixon.Stephen Kershnar - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (2):226-235.
Does sport have intrinsic value?Leon Culbertson - 2008 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (3):302 – 320.
Philosophy and Sport.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 2013 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Meaning as a Distinct and Fundamental Value: Reply to Kershnar.Thaddeus Metz - 2014 - Science, Religion and Culture 1 (2):101-106.
Love Your Opponent as Yourself: A Christian Ethic for Sport.Shawn Graves - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (1):50-69.
The value in equal opportunity: Reply to Kershnar.John O'dea - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2):177–187.
Talking the Good Game. [REVIEW]Michael Lavin - 1994 - International Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):140-141.
Sport for the Sake of the Soul.Michael W. Austin - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (1):20-29.
Moral Status and the Wrongness of Paternalism.David Birks - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (3):483-498.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-06-23
Downloads
29 (#538,668)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
2018-06-23
Downloads
29 (#538,668)
6 months
4 (#800,606)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
More than Bullshit: Trash Talk and Other Psychological Tests of Sporting Excellence.Christopher Johnson & Jason Taylor - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (1):47-61.
The Proper Place for External Motivations for Sport and Why They Need Not Subvert Its Internal Goods.Nicholas Dixon - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 12 (4):361-374.
Spilled milk and burned toast: extrinsic pressure and sporting excellence.Christopher Johnson & Jason Taylor - 2021 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48 (2):202-218.
The Problem of Evil in Sports: Applications and Arguments.Gabriel Andrade - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 15 (3):400-416.
Trash talk and Kantian values.Ornaith O’Dowd - 2022 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 49 (3):383-397.
References found in this work
The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to self.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - New York,USA: Oxford University Press.
Internalism and Internal Values in Sport.Robert L. Simon - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):1-16.
Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?J. S. Russell - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):27-49.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-hc2g5 uwo