Reconsidering euripides' Bellerophon

Classical Quarterly 64 (2):493-506 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No consensus has been reached about the reconstruction of Euripides' fragmentary tragedyBellerophon, but two suggestions have not received the serious attention they deserve. The first is that Stheneboea is a character in the play, and the second that Euripides does not depict Bellerophon as an atheist or an impious hero. In this paper, I shall reconsider both of these suggestions. In fact, the addition of Stheneboea to thedramatis personaeallows us to correct the second problem, as I shall propose that Stheneboea, not Bellerophon, speaks the infamous atheistic fragment.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-22

Downloads
12 (#996,020)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Greeks and the Irrational.E. R. Dodds - 1951 - Philosophy 28 (105):176-177.
Orestes , a euripidean sequel.Matthew Wright - 2006 - Classical Quarterly 56 (01):33-.
Toward a reconstruction of Iphigenia Aulidensis.David Kovacs - 2003 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 123:77-103.

Add more references