PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:139 - 147 (1990)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This paper examines methodological issues that arose in the course of the development of the inertial frame concept in classical mechanics. In particular it examines the origins and motivations of the view that the equivalence of inertial frames leads to a kind of conventionalism. It begins by comparing the independent versions of the idea found in J. Thomson (1884) and L. Lange (1885); it then compares Lange's conventionalist claims with traditional geometrical conventionalism. It concludes by examining some implications for contemporary philosophy of space and time.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A View From Nowhere: Quantum Reference Frames and Uncertainty.Michael Dickson - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):195-220.
On the Relation of Free Bodies, Inertial Sets and Arbitrariness.Hernán Gustavo Solari & Mario Alberto Natiello - 2021 - Science and Philosophy 9 (2):7-26.
Is Measurement a Black Box? On the Importance of Understanding Measurement Even in Quantum Information and Computation.Michael Dickson - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):1019–1032.
Science, Dualities and the Phenomenological Map.H. G. Solari & M. A. Natiello - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-28.
Similar books and articles
A Formal System for Classical Particle Mechanics, its Model-Theoretic Applications and Space-Time Structure.Toshio Ishigaki - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):267 - 292.
Inertial Reference Frame System.Wilfred Krause - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):61-83.
Conventionalism and Realism in Hans Reichenbach's Philosophy of Geometry.Carsten Klein - 2001 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):243 – 251.
On the Arbitrary Choice Regarding Which Inertial Reference Frame is "Stationary" and Which is "Moving" in the Special Theory of Relativity.Douglas M. Snyder - unknown
Conventionalism: From Poincare to Quine.Yemima Ben-Menahem - 2006 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Did Malament Prove the Non-Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity?Sahotra Sarkar & John Stachel - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (2):208-220.
A Limited Conventionalist Critique of Newtonian Space-Time.David Zaret - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (3):474-494.
Another Look at General Covariance and the Equivalence of Reference Frames.Dennis Dieks - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):174-191.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
34 ( #337,586 of 2,520,768 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,768 )
2011-05-29
Total views
34 ( #337,586 of 2,520,768 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,768 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads