Brazilian Public Policies for Reproductive Health: Family Planning, Abortion and Prenatal Care

Developing World Bioethics 7 (2):68-77 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study is an ethical reflection on the formulation and application of public policies regarding reproductive health in Brazil. The Integral Assistance Program for Women's Health (PAISM) can be considered advanced for a country in development. Universal access for family planning is foreseen in the Brazilian legislation, but the services do not offer contraceptive methods for the population in a regular and consistent manner. Abortion is restricted by law to two cases: risk to the woman's life and rape. This reality favors the practice of unsafe abortion, which is the third largest cause of maternal death in Brazil. Legal abortion is regulated by the State and the procedure is performed in public health centers. However, there is resistance on the part of professionals to attend these women. Prenatal care is a priority strategy for promoting the quality of life of these women and of future generations. Nonetheless, it is still difficult for these women to access the prenatal care services and to have the required number of consultations. Moreover, managers and health professionals need to be made aware of the importance of implementing the actions indicated by the public policies in the area of sexual and reproductive health, favoring respect for autonomy in a context of personal freedom.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Improving Abortion Access in Canada.Chris Kaposy - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (1):17-34.
Health care reform and abortion: A catholic moral perspective.James T. McHugh - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):491-500.
A new era in prenatal testing: are we prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
The Injustice of Unsafe Motherhood.Bernard M. Dickens Rebecca J. Cook - 2002 - Developing World Bioethics 2 (1):64-81.
Prenatal Testing, Reproductive Autonomy, and Disability Interests.Rosamund Scott - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):65-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
16 (#880,136)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references