A Dilemma for Saulish Skepticism: Either Self-Defeating or Not Even Skepticism

Disputatio 10 (48):43-55 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jennifer Saul argues that the evidence from the literature on implicit biases entails a form of skepticism. In this paper, I argue that Saul faces a dilemma: her argument is either self-defeating, or it does not yield a skeptical conclusion. For Saul, both results are unacceptable; thus, her argument fails.

Similar books and articles

Exuberant skepticism.Paul Kurtz - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by John R. Shook.
Plantinga’s Skepticism.Jim Slagle - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):1133-1145.
The Failure of Frances’s Live Skepticism.Susan Feldman - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):385-396.
1% Skepticism.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):271-290.
Can Modal Skepticism Defeat Humean Skepticism?Peter Hawke - 2016 - In Bob Fischer & Felipe Leon (eds.), Modal Epistemology After Rationalism. Cham: Springer. pp. 281-308.
The impossibility of local skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Skeptical theism, moral skepticism, and epistemic propriety.Jonathan Rutledge - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81 (3):263-272.
Unreasonable Cartesian Doubt.David Alexander - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (2):503-522.
Scepticism and Implicit Bias.Jennifer Saul - 2013 - Disputatio 5 (37):243-263.
Skeptical Theism, Moral Skepticism, and Divine Commands.Brian Ribeiro & Scott Aikin - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (2):77-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-27

Downloads
850 (#16,714)

6 months
103 (#37,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Samuel Director
Florida Atlantic University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Implicit bias.Michael Brownstein - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Scepticism and Implicit Bias.Jennifer Saul - 2013 - Disputatio 5 (37):243-263.

Add more references