Theistic and Non-Theistic Modes of Detachment from the Presence of the Infinite

Dialogue and Universalism 31 (1):233-254 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, we will describe two theistic modes of “paradoxical detachment” from the Presence of the Infinite, implying the coexistence of attachment and detachment. We will analyze two forms of Christianity-based paradoxical detachment: being dependent on the Ground of soul, while being detached from the representations of the Infinite ; being absolutely dependent on the Infinite, while being detached from any religious morality. The nontheistic mode of detachment from the Presence of the Infinite requires an absolute detachment. We will examine two forms of absolute detachment towards the Presence of the Infinite: on one hand, the all-encompassing emptiness in the Kagyü and Gelug lineages of Tibetan Buddhism; on the other hand, the Heideggerian notion of “groundless abyss.” In the Kagyü and Gelug lineages of Tibetan Buddhism, being absolutely detached is searching for the Enlightenment, while being detached from all concepts. Heideggerian notions of “groundless abyss” and “de-hominization” allow us to reach absolute detachment, while remaining in a non-theistic way of thinking.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scepticism and Self-Detachment.Casey Perin - 2020 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 10 (3-4):235-255.
Ethiek en onthechting.Xavier Vanmechelen - 2009 - Bijdragen 70 (3):337-358.
From a necessary being to god.Joshua Rasmussen - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):1-13.
The Theistic Argument from Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy.Philip Clayton - 1996 - International Philosophical Quarterly 36 (1):5-17.
Infinite Modes.Kristina Meshelski - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Imprint Academic. pp. 43-54.
A simplified form of condensed detachment.M. W. Bunder - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):169-173.
The two-property and condensed detachment.J. A. Kalman - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (2-3):173 - 179.
The Dialectics of Myth.Aleksei Losev - 2001 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 40 (3):4-29.
Deontic Logic with Defeasible Detachment.Xiaochang Yu - 1995 - Dissertation, University of Georgia
Condensed detachment as a rule of inference.J. A. Kalman - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (4):443 - 451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-10

Downloads
14 (#956,614)

6 months
4 (#797,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references