Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen

Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):365-368 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article briefly review the fundamentals of structural equation modeling for readers unfamiliar with the technique then goes on to offer a review of the Martin and Cullen paper. In summary, a number of fit indices reported by the authors reveal that the data do not fit their theoretical model and thus the conclusion of the authors that the model was “promising” are unwarranted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Fundamental Form of the Schrodinger Equation.Muhammad Adeel Ajaib - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (12):1586-1598.
On the stability of a class of kinetic equations.W. Maass - 1983 - Foundations of Physics 13 (7):715-729.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
81 (#196,909)

6 months
8 (#241,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?