Authors
Francesco Di Iorio
Nankai University
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to show that Boudon’s explanation of action in terms of “good reasons” can be philosophically enriched by merging his methodological perspective with Mises’ praxeology and Gadamer’s hermeneutics. In order to develop our goal of merging Boudon’s approach with Mises’ and Gadamer’s, we will focus on two points. The first is the identification of the invariable structure of human action. Unlike Boudon, we suggest that the best way to establish this invariable structure, which makes the explanation of action possible, is not to refer to the controversial concept of “human nature,” but rather to use Mises’ praxeological analysis of the invariable logic which all actions have in common. The second point analyzed in this article is the temporal and cultural dimension of the interpretative process which individuals elaborate to develop their reasons. This point, which is related to hermeneutical philosophy and is not investigated in detail by Boudon, is largely discussed by Gadamer. In our opinion, merging Gadamer’s description of the interpretative process – a process that Gadamer calls “hermeneutical circle” – and Boudon’s sociology of “good reasons” is useful because, unlike Boudon, Gadamer clarifies the epistemological nature of the interpretative process as well as the reasons why this process – which is a trial and error process – allows us to understand the actions of people who belong to different cultures.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/jeeh-2014-0010
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,089
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
The Counter-Revolution of Science. [REVIEW]W. J. H. Sprott - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (15):246-248.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Raymond Boudon as Social Theorist: A Comparison with Ludwig von Mises.Renaud Fillieule - 2014 - Journal de Economistes Et des Etudes Humaines 20 (2):91-128.
Gadamerian Hermeneutics and Irony: Between Strauss and Derrida.Robert Dostal - 2008 - Research in Phenomenology 38 (2):247-269.
Gadamer, Rorty, Hermeneutics, and Truth: A Response to Warnke.Donald Rothberg - 1986 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 29 (1-4):355-361.
The Temporality of Tarrying in Gadamer.Sheila Ross - 2006 - Theory, Culture and Society 23 (1):101-123.
Action as a Text: Gadamer's Hermeneutics and the Social Scientific Analysis of Action.Susan Hekman - 1984 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 14 (3):333–354.
Interpretation and Understanding in Hermeneutics and Deconstruction.A. T. Nuyen - 1994 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):426-438.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-12

Total views
8 ( #1,002,747 of 2,499,007 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,180 of 2,499,007 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes