A reply to dr Van heerden

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):71 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/xii.45.71

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Constructive empiricism and modal metaphysics: A reply to Monton and Van Fraassen.James Ladyman - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):755-765.
What is matter?P. J. van Heerden - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (4):276-285.
On traits as dispositions: An alleged truism.Jaap van Heerden & Anton J. Smolenaars - 1989 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19 (3):297–309.
The foundation of mathematics.Pieter Jacobus van Heerden - 1968 - Wassenaar,: Uitg. Wistik.
The foundation of physics.Pieter Jacobus van Heerden - 1967 - Wassenaar,: Wistik (postbus 1003).
Fantasy proneness, but not self-reported trauma is related to DRM performance of women reporting recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.Elke Geraerts, Elke Smeets, Marko Jelicic, Jaap van Heerden & Harald Merckelbach - 2005 - Consciousness and Cognition 14 (3):602-612.
Reply to Maurice Natanson's Reply.Van Meter Ames - 1956 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 (2):246 - 247.
A point of professor Dingle's.P. J. van Heerden - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
75 (#209,707)

6 months
1 (#1,346,405)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references