Reasoning in abstract dialectical frameworks using quantified Boolean formulas

Argument and Computation 6 (2):149-177 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

dialectical frameworks constitute a recent and powerful generalisation of Dung's argumentation frameworks, where the relationship between the arguments can be specified via Boolean formulas. Recent results have shown that this enhancement comes with the price of higher complexity compared to AFs. In fact, acceptance problems in the world of ADFs can be hard even for the third level of the polynomial hierarchy. In order to implement reasoning problems on ADFs, systems for quantified Boolean formulas thus are suitable engines to be employed. In this paper we give complexity sensitive QBF encodings of ADF problems generalising recent work on QBFs for AF labellings. Our encodings provide a uniform and modular way of translating reasoning in ADFs to QBFs, that can be used as the basis for novel systems for ADF reasoning.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Examining fragments of the quantified propositional calculus.Steven Perron - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (3):1051-1080.
Second-order reasoning in description logics.Andrzej Szalas - 2006 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 16 (3-4):517-530.
Propositional consistency proofs.Samuel R. Buss - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 52 (1-2):3-29.
Algebraic Methods and Bounded Formulas.Domenico Zambella - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1):37-48.
Analogy argumentation in law: A dialectical perspective. [REVIEW]Harm Kloosterhuis - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):173-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-06-19

Downloads
93 (#180,495)

6 months
54 (#77,219)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile