Representation and Resemblance

Philosophical Forum 12 (2):139 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of representation is a problematic one. So is that of resemblance or similarity. But both concepts can be clarified via a modification of Wittgenstein's notion of a "family-resemblance." I shall introduce an extended version of that notion, specifically relevant to representational objects, after presenting some arguments which show the need for it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Resemblance.Gabriel Greenberg - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (2):215-287.
Defining depiction.Ben Blumson - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):143-157.
Diagrammatic representation in geometry.Dennis Potter - 2006 - Dialectica 60 (4):369–382.
The Naturalism of Pictorial Representation.Douglas John Dempster - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Misrepresentation in Context.Woosuk Park - 2014 - Foundations of Science 19 (4):363-374.
Depiction and convention.Ben Blumson - 2008 - Dialectica 62 (3):335-348.
A Model‐Theoretic Account of Representation.Steven French - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1472-1483.
Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
Canny resemblance.Catharine Abell - 2009 - Philosophical Review 118 (2):183-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
377 (#50,847)

6 months
53 (#78,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Dilworth
Western Michigan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Teleology Revisited.Ernest Nagel - 1977 - Journal of Philosophy 74.

Add more references