Science Generates Limit Paradoxes

Axiomathes 25 (4):409-432 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sciences occasionally generate discoveries that undermine their own assumptions. Two such discoveries are characterized here: the discovery of apophenia by cognitive psychology and the discovery that physical systems cannot be locally bounded within quantum theory. It is shown that such discoveries have a common structure and that this common structure is an instance of Priest’s well-known Inclosure Schema. This demonstrates that science itself is dialetheic: it generates limit paradoxes. How science proceeds despite this fact is briefly discussed, as is the connection between our results and the realism-antirealism debate. We conclude by suggesting a position of epistemic modesty.

Similar books and articles

Why quantum theory is possibly wrong.Holger Lyre - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1429-1438.
Are there true contradictions? A critical discussion of Graham Priest's, beyond the limits of thought.Jürgen Dümont & Frank Mau - 1998 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):289-299.
Quantum theory and neuroplasticity: Implications for social theory.William J. Long - 2006 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26 (1-2):78-94.
Quantum mechanics and realism.Peter Kosso - 2000 - Foundations of Science 5 (1):47-60.
Two paradoxes in quantum mechanics.H. P. Krips - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (2):145-152.
Common knowledge and limit knowledge.Christian W. Bach & Jérémie Cabessa - 2012 - Theory and Decision 73 (3):423-440.
Definability and the Structure of Logical Paradoxes.Haixia Zhong - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):779 - 788.
Aspects of Independence and Determinacy in Qm and Realism.Phillip Walter Hoffmann - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Calgary (Canada)
Ontic structural realism and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.Michael Esfeld - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (1):19-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-21

Downloads
827 (#17,452)

6 months
117 (#30,747)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Dietrich
State University of New York at Binghamton

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Knowledge and its limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind.John R. Searle - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 44 references / Add more references