In Ken Ford & Zenon Pylyshyn (eds.), The Robot's Dilemma Revisited (1996)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
It is shown that the Fodor's interpretation of the frame problem is the central indication that his version of the Modularity Thesis is incompatible with computationalism. Since computationalism is far more plausible than this thesis, the latter should be rejected.
|
| Keywords | Frame Problem Computationalism Modularity Thesis |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology.Jerry A. Fodor - 1983 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Classical Computationalism and the Many Problems of Cognitive Relevance.Richard Samuels - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3):280-293.
Analogy and Conceptual Change, or You Can't Step Into the Same Mind Twice.Eric Dietrich - 2000 - In Eric Dietrich Art Markman (ed.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 265--294.
The Frame Problem: An AI Fairy Tale. [REVIEW]Kevin B. Korb - 1998 - Minds and Machines 8 (3):317-351.
Equivalence of the Frame and Halting Problems.Eric Dietrich & Chris Fields - 2020 - Algorithms 13 (175):1-9.
Culture, Cognitive Pluralism and Rationality.Colin W. Evers - 2007 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4):364–382.
Similar books and articles
On the Input Problem for Massive Modularity.John M. Collins - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (1):1-22.
Fodor's Frame Problem and Relevance Theory (Reply to Chiappe & Kukla).Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):530-532.
What’s the Problem with the Frame Problem?Sheldon J. Chow - 2013 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2):309-331.
The Frame Problem and the Treatment of Prediction.Mark Sprevak - 2005 - In L. Magnani & R. Dossena (eds.), Computing, Philosophy and Cognition. pp. 4--349.
Against Modularity.William Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler - 1987 - In Modularity In Knowledge Representation And Natural- Language Understanding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Moderately Massive Modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 67-89.
The Frame Problem and Theories of Belief.Scott Hendricks - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (2):317-33.
Against Postulating Central Systems in the Mind.Jacob J. Ross - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (2):297-312.
The Frame Problem Blues. Once More, with Feeling.Zenon Pylyshyn - 1996 - In K. M. Ford & Z. W. Pylyshyn (eds.), The Robot's Dilemma Revisited: The Frame Problem in Artificial Intelligence. Ablex.
Fodor on Cognition, Modularity, and Adaptationism.Samir Okasha - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):68-88.
On Fodor's The Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551-562.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-12-08
Total views
1,004 ( #6,054 of 2,497,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #8,866 of 2,497,737 )
2012-12-08
Total views
1,004 ( #6,054 of 2,497,737 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
83 ( #8,866 of 2,497,737 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
