In Aaron Hughes & Russell McCutcheon (eds.), Religion in 5 Minutes (2017)

Nathan Eric Dickman
University of The Ozarks
In forging a difference between philosophy and religion, contestable generalizations are unavoidable. A helpful question for resisting hasty ones is: Which? If someone asks, “What do Hindus do or believe?” Ask, “Which Hindus?” And if someone asks, “What do atheists believe?” It’s still, “Which atheists?” Distinguishing variations of people who practice a religion helps us get specific. We could ask, “Which religion, and which philosophy?” This might lead to a provocative difference, like Nietzsche’s poke at Christianity as just Platonism for the people.
Keywords philosophy  religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,975
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Conception of the Philosophy of Religion.Piotr Moskal - 2008 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 56 (1):221-237.
What is Philosophy of Religion? The Nature of Philosophy of Religion.A. Asgari Yazdi - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Theological Research 12 (48):135-146.
Hegel and the Consecrated States.Mark Tunick - 2013 - In Angelica Nuzzo (ed.), Hegel on Religion and Politics. SUNY Press. pp. 19.


Added to PP index

Total views
18 ( #604,948 of 2,498,178 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,239 of 2,498,178 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes