Property and women’s alienation from their own reproductive labour

Bioethics 15 (3):205–217 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is an urgent need for reconstructing models of property to make them more women-friendly. However, we need not start from scratch: both ‘canonical’ and feminist authors can sometimes provide concepts which we can refine and apply towards women’s propertylessness. This paper looks in particular at women’s alienation from their reproductive labour, building on Marx and Delphy. Developing an economic and political rather than a psychological reading of alienation, it then considers how the refined and revised concept can be applied to concrete examples in global justice for women: in particular, the commercialisation of embryonic and fetal tissue in the new stem cell technologies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#250,762)

6 months
4 (#818,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donna Dickenson
Birkbeck, University of London

References found in this work

The Sexual Contract.Carole Pateman - 1988 - Ethics 100 (3):658-669.
On Psychological Oppression.Sandra Bartky - 1979 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):190-190.
A Theory of Property.Stephen R. Munzer - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
A Theory of Property.Stephen R. Munzer - 1991 - Mind 100 (2):300-302.

View all 16 references / Add more references