Kant, Mothersill and principles of taste

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (4):375-376 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/431137

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Taste and objectivity: The emergence of the concept of the aesthetic.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
Kant's theory of judgment, and judgments of taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's theory of taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
The role of symbolic presentation in Kant's theory of taste.Alexander Rueger & Sahan Evren - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):229-247.
In defense of Hume and the causal theory of taste.Mary Mothersill - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):312-317.
James Shelley on critical principles.George Dickie - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
The century of taste: the philosophical odyssey of taste in the eighteenth century.George Dickie - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
76 (#210,613)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references