125 George Dickie

In Diarmuid Costello & Jonathan Vickery (eds.), Art: key contemporary thinkers. New York: Berg. pp. 124 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
A defence of aesthetic experience: In reply to George Dickie.Lawrence W. Hyman - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):62-63.
What is Art.George Dickie - 1976 - In Lars Aagaard-Mogensen (ed.), Culture and art: an anthology. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Why not the both?George Dickie - 1987 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (3):297.
The character and role of principles in the evaluation of art.James Shelley - 2002 - British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (1):37-51.
Ethics and aesthetics: Replies to Dickie, Stecker, and Livingston.Noël Carroll - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):82-95.
What is anti-art?George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (4):419-421.
Defining Art.George Dickie - 1969 - American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (3):253 - 256.
Evaluating art.Dickie George - 1985 - British Journal of Aesthetics 25 (1):3-16.
An artistic misunderstanding.George Dickie - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1):69-71.
An earnest reply to professor Stalker.George Dickie - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):713-718.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references