An earnest reply to professor Stalker

Philosophia 8 (4):713-718 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf02379061

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Logical constructivism, modal logic, and metaphysics: A reply to professor Pruss' ``professor Lucas' second epistemic way''. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.
A reply to professor Margolis.Review author[S.]: George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229-231.
Why machines can't think: A reply to James Moor.Douglas F. Stalker - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (3):317-20.
Representation and presentation: A reply to professor Dickie.Monroe C. Beardsley - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (9):238-241.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Explaining computer behavior.James H. Moor - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (October):325-7.
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to professor beard's, 'professor Lucas on omniscience'. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#715,461)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references