Supporting Second Victims of Patient Safety Events: Shouldn't These Communications Be Covered by Legal Privilege?

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (4):852-858 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The harmful impact of an adverse event ripples beyond injured patients and their families to affect physicians, nurses, and other health care staff that are involved. These “Second Victims” may experience intense feelings of anxiety, guilt, and fear. They may doubt their clinical competence or ability to continue working at all. Some go on to suffer post-traumatic stress disorder and depression.Medical institutions long ignored this problem, preferring to believe that adverse events, or “errors,” occur due to incompetence — the unfortunate work of a few “bad” practitioners who deserve, if anything, a reprimand for their negligence. Study after study has rejected this attribution and shown that adverse events in health care stem primarily from systemic flaws, not “bad apples.” Devastating errors, in other words, can, do, and always will happen in the care of competent, well-trained, and caring practitioners.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distracting communications in the operating theatre.Nick Sevdalis, Andrew N. Healey & Charles A. Vincent - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (3):390-394.
Rethinking the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination.Mike Redmayne - 2005 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (2):209-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
31 (#504,675)

6 months
22 (#119,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references